Alliot Marie ... An obvious conflict of interest ....
with a combination of unfortunate circumstances ... conflict of interest but still ...
http://www.sudouest.fr/2011/02/06/l-etau-se-resserre-autour-de-michele-alliot-marie-311095-652.php
For if Alliot Marie, who had probably prepared his private trip had long since chosen another destination ... For if
Alliot Marie had just done two hours drive ... the case of the private jet would not have come on the table ...
For if the young Tunisian was not sacrificed ... Ben Ali is still a dictator enjoyed by world leaders ...
For if instead of seeing just a riot, our Observers had seen a revolution from the start ...
With so ... we could rewrite history without knowing nothing ... and we would not have known ... Moreover, the own conflict of interest is that they are often hidden ... because our political leaders never act as a simple citizen!
Moreover, the explanations provided by Ms. Alliot Marie only confirm that conflict of interest ... and his speech to the National Assembly that is even more outrageous ... go to offer the services of our policemen to another government is a disgrace ... under the declaration of human rights and citizen who is part Article 12 of our constitution: "The guarantee of human rights and citizen necessitates a public force: this force is therefore instituted for the benefit of all and not for the benefit of those to whom it is entrusted. " surely and certainly not for foreign dictatorships ...
As Foreign Minister, how to accept such a gift for riding? She got wind that there was a revolt in several cities? She does not wonder ... about what is happening and will go quietly vacation? Do not forget that Ms. Alliot Marie is compensated for his duties, although elective but because it was good enough to represent the French people ... for many years, his income depends on taxes from French and that if she is able to afford a vacation abroad with tax ... A number of those who pay taxes can not even take a vacation in France ...
We see that what is called "public money" always comes back in the pocket of "private" ... because it is initially taken to "private" ... This is mainly forgotten by those who profit ... then elected to take up its end of elected: do do (yes, yes, they are very likely to think that public money is a bottomless pit) or accept any gift other than its benefits ... and pay all their expenses with money that has been legally assigned ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment